Comissão do Senado: Mandato é do partido e não do candidato

Publicado em   07/abr/2011
por  Caio Hostilio

Brasília – A comissão de reforma política do Senado aprovou, ontem (6/4), o entendimento do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE) sobre a fidelidade partidária, segundo o qual o mandado pertence aos partidos e não aos eleitos. Com isso, o abandono da sigla sem justa causa acarretará perda do mandado.


O presidente da comissão, senador Francisco Dornelles (PP-RJ), afirmou que pretende apresentar o relatório final dos trabalhos ainda esta semana. A ideia é compilar os itens aprovados e transformá-los em anteprojeto de lei a ser votado pelo plenário da Casa.


A comissão também manteve a decisão do TSE sobre a cláusula de barreira permitindo que apenas terão direito do funcionamento parlamentar os partidos com no mínimo três representantes de diferentes estados. Em relação ao limite de gastos, uma lei deve limitar os valores para os partido.


Também foi aprovada pela comissão a proposta apresentada pelo senador Itamar Franco (PPS-MG) em relação à possibilidade de candidaturas avulsas. Segundo o texto, poderá haver candidaturas avulsas exclusivamente para as eleições municipais (prefeitos e vereadores), sendo obrigatório o apoio de um percentual mínimo de eleitores na circunscrição para o qual o candidato pleiteie o registro.


Em relação à filiação partidária e ao domicílio eleitoral, a comissão manteve a legislação atual. Ela diz que para se candidatar é preciso que o político tenha domicílio eleitoral na respectiva circunscrição pelo prazo de pelo menos um ano antes do pleito. Também deverá estar filiado a um partido pelo mesmo prazo.


A comissão de reforma política negou, por 7 votos a 6, a proposta de federação de partidos. Dornelles argumentou que não faz sentido aprovar a federação partidária, já que a comissão havia proibido a existência de coligações.


Hoje (7), último dia de trabalho da comissão, serão analisadas as propostas de aplicação de quotas para as mulheres e a que permite consulta popular.

  Publicado em: Governo

36 comentários para Comissão do Senado: Mandato é do partido e não do candidato

  1. Glauber disse:

    Muito interessante! Tem que meter o bedelho mesmo, por que a coisa tá crítica!!! é isso aí!!!

  2. Melba Perkins disse:

    Wow this is a great resource.. I’m enjoying it.. good article

  3. Handy ideas will use these immediately.

  4. Alayna Honn disse:

    I think that this wedding is one of the greatest things to happen of the recent years. Felicitations to the happy couple and any one that doesn’t agree is a misery.

  5. Now I’ve seen CBS’s 60 minutes episode I be sure Lance is done for.

  6. Shera Manago disse:

    After watching CBS’s 60 Mins show you have to be sure Lance is done for.

  7. Ever since that episode of 60 Minutes I be sure Armstrong is done for.

  8. Seema Hellner disse:

    I definitely dig your views!

  9. Great post, thanks to whoever thought of it and for having the initiave to put it up

  10. Aubrey Warton disse:

    Many thanks for the post, I don’t quite agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I definitely applaud your effort in putting it so succinctly.

  11. Many thanks for the post, I don’t quite agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so succinctly.

  12. Pleasant post, I genuinely enjoyed glossing over it, keep up all the hard work.

  13. Leila Moretta disse:

    Lovely piece, many thanks for having the initiave to put your ideas down

  14. Berta Rushlow disse:

    Amazing piece of writing,I’m sure you could have without a doubt built up a web site I wish to read repeatedly. Great stuff.

  15. Li Konye disse:

    Great page, I genuinely had a good time reading it, keep up the good efforts.

  16. I think that this wedding is one of the best things to happen of the decade. Best wishes to the happy newlyweds and any one that doesn’t agree is a stick in the mud.

  17. Kyung Deniken disse:

    I definitely agree with this!

  18. Gracias for today’s entry, honestly, can you sign up as a contributor for wikipedia because the current entries hosted there for our hobby is quite frankly drivel. I don’t agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so succinctly.

  19. I don’t agree with it, many thanks for taking the time to put it up

  20. Thi Joern disse:

    Many thanks for today’s entry, I don’t agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I definitely applaud your effort in putting it so clearly.

  21. Chere Heydel disse:

    I don’t agree with it, thanks to whoever thought of it and for taking the time to think of it

  22. Grazie for this entry, honestly, can you become a writer for wikipedia because the current pages hosted there for our interest is quite frankly drivel. I don’t agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I wholeheartedly applaud your effort in putting it so succinctly.

  23. Marvelous posting,It looks like you could have emphatically built up a web page I wish to check back on regularly. Thanks a lot.

  24. Tremendous piece,It is my opinion you could have for sure built a website I have to come back to on a weekly basis. Thanks.

  25. Rosana Pusch disse:

    Fine piece,I reckon you could have clearly launched a blog I want to visit on a weekly basis. Thank you.

  26. Kathe Lavin disse:

    Lovely piece, props to you for making the effort to throw it up

  27. Remarkable content,I feel you have unquestionably established an internet site I wish to read up on frequently. Thanks.

  28. Kathe Coones disse:

    I can’t say I completely agree, thanks to whoever thought of it and for showing the initiative to think of it

  29. Many thanks for the post, seriously, can you become a author for wikipedia because the current pages in there for our interest is frankly next to useless. I can’t say I agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so ably.

  30. Many thanks for today’s entry, seriously, can you sign up as a contributor for wikipedia because the current pages in there for our hobby is frankly next to useless. I don’t agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I wholeheartedly applaud your effort in putting it so ably.

  31. Chana Quigley disse:

    Thanks for your post, I don’t quite agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so clearly.

  32. Tawny Fiddler disse:

    After watching that 60 Minutes Program I would bet Lance Armstrong is finished.

  33. Denise Solich disse:

    Pleasant article, I genuinely had a good time reading it, keep doing the hard writing.

  34. Alta Hook disse:

    Fun article, I actually benefited from reading it, keep doing the good work.

  35. I think that this wedding will be one of the greatest things to happen of the decade. The wishes of a nation to the happy newlyweds and any body that doesn’t agree is a killjoy.

Deixe uma resposta

Contatos

hostiliocaio@hotmail.com

PUBLICIDADE

PUBLICIDADE

Busca no Blog

Arquivos

Arquivos